![]() ![]() ![]() what is it 4 months? 3? and then new DLC every year. More generally, I hope they keep up what they've been doing, with a new major version every. And if science was tossed and replaced with something either a little more involved (as in you can't just toss all your science doodads on your ship and go) or a little less involved (as in just having the science doodads automatically collected science so you didn't have to click on things over and over during a flyby) would be welcome. There have been novels written on ideas so I won't rehash anything here. A career and science rewrite would be awesome, as in throw away the entire way contracts work and replace it with. I still have hope that they'll revisit some of the old stalwart things that have been around for years. Luckily, most burns were prograde or retrograde so it wasn't THAT bad, but anything more complex would have driven me insane. The writing is on the "front" of the ship from the engine's perspective, which means I had to do all of my burns facing backwards. So I could have just put the core on the normal way and gotten the same end result (4000 science points from Minmus without having to return any Kerbals home from their duties off-world). Sadly due to the way KSP calculates re-entry heating (which is still just a dark art to me) the probe core explodes on re-entry even though I set it up this way specifically to protect everything. Note the engine sticking out the top, and the probe core at right angles to it. Very specifically speaking, I built this monstrosity: I actually never paid any attention to where the name of the probe core is on it.ĭo you build your rovers with the probe core facing up when the rover is on the wheels? That's how I do it and it always works fine. I always build all my rovers with the front facing the flag on the wall in the VAB. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |